<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Schools = Bad Schools?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesbetelle.com/2006/11/12/old-schools-bad-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesbetelle.com/2006/11/12/old-schools-bad-schools/</link>
	<description>The Search for a Lost Architect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 00:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gotham Gazette - The Wonkster &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Fight over Julia Richman</title>
		<link>http://jamesbetelle.com/2006/11/12/old-schools-bad-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Gotham Gazette - The Wonkster &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Fight over Julia Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesbetelle.wordpress.com/2006/11/12/old-schools-bad-schools/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] The James Betelle, Where Are You? blog, while also objecting to the plan, takes a different approach: &#8220;The not-so-subtle insinuation here is that [the building&#039;s] age makes it a bad school facility worthy of demolition, while a new structure is inherently better,&#8221; But, the writer continues, &quot;School construction from the 1920-30s is often more solid, more insulated, more efficient than modern structures&quot; It&#039;s hardly surprising that most schools built in this period are still functioning.&quot; Compiled by Gail Robinson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The James Betelle, Where Are You? blog, while also objecting to the plan, takes a different approach: &#8220;The not-so-subtle insinuation here is that [the building's] age makes it a bad school facility worthy of demolition, while a new structure is inherently better,&#8221; But, the writer continues, &#8220;School construction from the 1920-30s is often more solid, more insulated, more efficient than modern structures&#8221; It&#8217;s hardly surprising that most schools built in this period are still functioning.&#8221; Compiled by Gail Robinson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

